5 Common Grant Writing Mistakes (part 2)

Admin
December 2, 2021
-
6
min read

How about entering the new year with your Grant writing skills sharply sharpened?

2 weeks ago we shared some pitfalls to avoid in Grant writing. Today, we are sharing a list of more grant writing mistakes you should avoid winning that fat cheque.

1. Unclear/Vague/Bland Proposal

This is usually the problem when a proposal lacks adequate research or context. You have to discuss the statement problem, innovative solution, budget and sustainability plan with clarity. Make sure your proposal shows your funder the step-by-step actions of the project. This gives your funder a better perspective of your goal. Your framework needs to present a concise and consistent agenda. Avoid unnecessary bluffs.

2. Incomplete or missing answers to application questions

Although it’s hard to imagine submitting an unfinished proposal, this is not uncommon especially when applicants are rushing to meet a deadline. Focusing more on deadlines over quality is a grant proposal wrecker.

If you haven’t answered what the funder wants to know about your project, your application won’t move to the next level. The reviewer may dismiss your proposal immediately without even reviewing the entire document.

3. Formatting Errors

This is one of the most recurring errors. At times, a grant applicant may write the application haphazardly ignoring the formatting, organizational and aesthetic guidelines stipulated clearly by the funding agencies. If you are to send in your application as a document via email, here are some of the basic formatting rules:

• 11-point font or larger

• At least 0.5” margins all around

• Single line spacing

• Standard character spacing (neither expanded nor condensed)

• Arial or Times New Roman font

• Microsoft Word® or Adobe® PDF filetype

• Entire file size of 3MB or less

• Figures large enough to be legible and decipherable

4. Impact Gap

A reviewer is more concerned about the difference your project will make. Your proposal may tell a bewitching tale that captivates the reviewer. It may even be practical, perfect, and involve an all-star team.

Yet, if reviewers can’t see its impact, you ruin your chances of getting funds.

5. Cohesion

Does your answer in the latest question flow with your answer in the previous one?

Does the summary adequately summarize what is outlined in the full proposal?

Does the budget match up with the proposed innovation?

A proposal that does not align from section to section will give the impression that you cobbled it together from 'junks '. Plus, it will not only confuse the reviewers but also give the funders a clear reason not to fund your project.

We hope you really enjoyed the 2 part series.

Here’s wishing you a beautiful new year ahead.

Go secure the bag!

Do you need an expert to help with your next Grant?
Yes please!